JPofiler was developed by people behind ej-technologies and is described as FusionReactor is also focused on production environments, whereas JProfiler is typically used during development. According to the folks behind the product, they believe that developers are looking for a range of developer-focused capabilities, which combine with metric data to bring a best-of-both-worlds solution to assist with error detection. It’s worth mentioning up-front that FusionReactor is marketed as a developer-focused Application Performance Monitor ( APM) tool. However, in the Java world, JProfiler plays a dominant role in the marketplace, and we’re taking this opportunity to compare it to FusionReactor. We concluded that for production-level profiling, FusionReactor is an undoubted winner. In our previous blog posts, we compared FusionReactor with open source java profiling tools such as GUI-based Java VisualVM, and terminal applications such as jcmdand jstack. In this post, we look at the JProfiler alternative FusionReactor and how the two compare. Is FusionReactor an excellent alternative to JProfiler?.In FusionReactor, all the exceptions can be seen in the Error History tab.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |